Why Is It So Hard to Make Easy Software?

Generally speaking, the software isn’t hard at all. We humans perform complex operations all day long. Our brains are wired to do many tasks, often simultaneously, without much thought or energy. Only when we try to duplicate these tasks with technology do we realize just how many steps there are, and designing good software to copy them gets tricky.

Do you remember the high school English class exercise that required you to write down the steps to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich? Do you remember how silly it seemed for the teacher to devise a massively simple assignment only to realize how hard it was? Proper communication in a step-by-step process is critical. The software is no different. Truly functional software, such as business management software, has to consider all the possible reasons that tasks need to be done and all the ways they get done before the first line of code can be written. The most time-consuming process of creating good software is the planning stage, where you outline exactly what needs to get done in the first place. Instead of saying, “Get two pieces of bread,” to make your sandwich, you must first ask, “Where is the bread?” You may not even be in the kitchen, which is where the bread is.


All software begins with this planning stage. Often, this stage takes 4 to 5 times longer than the actual code writing. While all software starts here, only good software, the easiest to use, the kind that makes you say, “Wow, that was easy” the first time you use it, takes much more time to plan properly. True engineering and mastery of design are required to create naturally intuitive process steps and combine multiple actions into what feels like one.

Unfortunately, most of us have been forced to use poorly designed software daily. Software that requires many steps to do what seems to be one action. It was probably not the intent of the software designers to make “hard” software. However, at some point in the planning stage, someone was satisfied with how all the steps were laid out, and the green light to begin writing code was given. The problem was that not enough planning had been done, or more steps were added to the process after planning, yet nobody returned to the planning to re-think the strategy. Therefore, clumsy, clunky, cloggy software was delivered. When more hours go into testing and bug removal than actual design, the result is difficult software. If the software training takes more than a day for staff familiar with the industry and daily tasks, you’ve got difficult software.


We are in the business of tracking software. Trucking software encompasses trucking dispatch, arguably one of the single most complex positions in any small business. Dispatch is the easy word for workflow management and exists in many industries. Dispatching generally refers to assigning workers to jobs based on geographic proximity and schedule availability in most industries. There are genuine hurdles to overcome regularly for a dispatcher, such as job delays or traffic that often result in last-minute changes to job assignments or constant rearranging of resources to avoid losing precious revenue. In the trucking industry, these standard hurdles are often compounded because of the time required to perform jobs (2 days or more) and the fact that resources are spread across an entire country.
Additionally, a trucking dispatcher has another set of dimensions to work around – DOT regulations. The Department of Transportation oversees the trucking industry’s safety regulations governing the number of hours a driver can drive in a single shift and the equipment maintenance standards. All trucking companies must adhere to safe operation.

The software that manages this specific type of dispatch is called trucking software or trucking dispatch software. Trucking software allows the user to see each truck job in motion – who is assigned to it, what truck they are driving, and when they are supposed to arrive at a specific location – and document regular status updates. This software gives the dispatch staff full “load visibility” to do their job effectively. With each change or update, the dispatcher should easily mark those updates accordingly in the software. And if they had easy software, they would. But that is not always the case. With all its complexities, Trucking is difficult to reproduce in the digital world. The dispatcher does each physical task, which often equates to multiple steps in a process that must tie into other actions later in the overall business process. What if you must assign a different driver to a shipment because the originally assigned one is delayed on his last load? What if the next job for a driver is delayed or canceled, and another job is needed for him to continue to earn a living? What if a truck breaks down in the middle of a job – who takes over? How does the broken truck get fixed?

These are the daily tasks of the trucking dispatcher. And the best tool – his only tool – is good tracking software. Software that was designed with this type of user in mind. Software that spent more time in the design phase than in the code writing or testing phase. Trucking software needs to be as rugged as the trucks and drivers it manages yet easy enough to use that the dispatchers don’t feel like they are physically pulling the trucks themselves. While there are lots of trucking software options on the market, few do the job well, and fewer are still considered easy.

The easy software is difficult to come by. It takes more planning and design than most people are willing to commit to. If you are using software to manage your business and think it’s not easy enough to use, maybe you’re right. Perhaps you should be looking for something better. The new software is always being developed to handle the same issues better, all because those developers take the time to plan. To learn more about Masslogics Trucking Software, visit our website or call our toll-free number.
We look forward to speaking with you about your trucking software needs.


Alcohol scholar. Bacon fan. Internetaholic. Beer geek. Thinker. Coffee advocate. Reader. Have a strong interest in consulting about teddy bears in Nigeria. Spent 2001-2004 promoting glue in Pensacola, FL. My current pet project is testing the market for salsa in Las Vegas, NV. In 2008 I was getting to know birdhouses worldwide. Spent 2002-2008 buying and selling easy-bake-ovens in Bethesda, MD. Spent 2002-2009 marketing country music in the financial sector.