Introduction
Computer forensics is the practice of collecting, analyzing, and reporting digital information in a legally permissible way. It can detect and prevent crime in any dispute where evidence is stored digitally. Computer forensics has comparable examination stages to other forensic disciplines and faces similar issues.
About this guide
This guide discusses computer forensics from a neutral perspective. It is not linked to particular legislation or intended to promote a specific company or product and is not written with bias from either law enforcement or commercial computer forensics. It is aimed at a non-technical audience and provides a high-level view of computer forensics. This guide uses the term “computer,” but the concepts apply to any device that stores digital information. Where methodologies have been mentioned, they are provided as examples only and do not constitute recommendations or advice. Copying and publishing the whole or part of this article is licensed solely under the terms of the Creative Commons – Attribution Non-Commercial 3.0 license…
READ MORE :
- How to Become a Review Blogger
- Deal Or No Deal Computer Game
- Troubleshooting a Broken Computer
- Ways to Stop Computer Freezes and Game Lag
- What to Look for in a Web Designer or Design Agency
Uses of computer forensics
There are few areas of crime or dispute where computer forensics cannot be applied. Law enforcement agencies have been among the earliest and heaviest users of computer forensics and, consequently, have often been at the forefront of developments in the field. Computers may constitute a ‘scene of a crime, for example, with hacking [ 1] or denial of service attacks [2], or they may hold evidence in the form of emails, internet history, documents, or other files relevant to crimes such as murder, kidnap, fraud, and drug trafficking. It is not just the content of emails, documents, and other files that may interest investigators but also the ‘meta-data [3] associated with those files. A computer forensic examination may reveal when a document first appeared on a computer when it was last edited, when it was later saved or printed, and which user carried out these actions. More recently, commercial organizations have used computer forensics to their benefit in a variety of cases, such as;
- Intellectual Property Theft
- Industrial espionage
- Employment disputes
- Fraud investigations
- Forgeries
- Matrimonial issues
- Bankruptcy Investigations
- Inappropriate email and internet use in the workplace
- Regulatory compliance
- Guidelines
For evidence to be admissible, it must be reliable and not prejudicial. At all stages of this process, admissibility should be at the forefront of a computer forensic examiner’s mind. One set of guidelines widely accepted to assist in this is the Association of Chief Police Officers Good Practice Guide for Computer-Based Electronic Evidence or ACPO Guide for short. Although the ACPO Guide is aimed at United Kingdom law enforcement, its main principles apply to all computer forensics in whatever legislature. The four main principles from this guide have been reproduced below (with references to law enforcement removed):
No action should change data held on a computer or storage media which may be subsequently relied upon in court. When a person finds it necessary to access original data stored on a computer or storage media, they must be competent to do so and give evidence explaining the relevance and the implications of their actions.
An audit trail or another record of all processes applied to computer-based electronic evidence should be created and preserved. An independent third party should be able to examine those processes and achieve the same result. The person in charge of the investigation ensures that the law and these principles are adhered to. In summary, no changes should be made to the original. However, if access/changes are necessary, the examiner must know what they are doing and record their actions.
Live acquisition
Principle 2 above may raise the question: In what situation would changes to a suspect’s computer by a computer forensic examiner be necessary? Traditionally, the computer forensic examiner would copy (or acquire) information from a turned-off device. A write-blocker[4] would make an exact bit-for-bit copy [5] of the original storage medium. The examiner would then work from this copy, leaving the original unchanged.
However, sometimes it is not possible or desirable to switch a computer off. Switching a computer off may not be possible if doing so would result in considerable financial or other loss for the owner. Switching a computer off may not be desirable if doing so would mean that potentially valuable evidence may be lost. In both these circumstances, the computer forensic examiner would need to conduct a ‘live acquisition’ involving running a small program on the suspect’s computer to copy (or acquire) the data to the examiner’s hard drive.
By running such a program and attaching a destination drive to the suspect computer, the examiner will make changes and additions to the state of the computer that was not present in his actions. Such actions would remain admissible as long as the examiner recorded their efforts, was aware of their impact, and could explain them.
themexamination
For this article, the computer forensic examination process has been divided into six stages. Although they are presented in their usual chronological order, it is necessary to be flexible during an examination. For example, during the analysis stage, the examiner may find a new lead, which would warrant further computers being examined and a return to the evaluation stage.
Readiness
Forensic readiness is an important and occasionally overlooked stage in the examination process. Commercial computer forensics can include educating clients about system preparedness; forensic examinations will provide stronger evidence if a server or computer’s built-in auditing and logging systems are switched on. For examiners, there are many areas where a prior organization can help, including training, regular testing, and verification of software and equipment, familiarity with legislation, dealing with unexpected issues (e.g., what to do if child pornography is present during a commercial job), and ensuring that your on-site acquisition kit is complete and in working order.
Evaluation
The evaluation stage includes receiving clear instructions, risk analysis, and allocating roles and resources. Risk analysis for law enforcement may involve assessing the likelihood of a physical threat entering a suspect’s property and how best to deal with it. Commercial organizations also need to be aware of health and safety issues, while their evaluation would also cover the reputational and financial risks of accepting a particular project.
Collection
The main part of the collection stage, acquisition, has been introduced above. This stage would include identifying, securing, and documenting the scene if an investment is carried out on-site rather than in a computer forensic laboratory. Interviews or meetings with personnel who may hold information relevant to the examination (which could consist of the end-users of the computer and the manager and person responsible for providing computer services) would usually be carried out at this stage. The ‘bagging and tagging’ audit trail would start by sealing any materials in unique tamper-evident bags. Consideration must also be given to the secure and safe transport of the material to the examiner’s laboratory.
Analysis
The analysis depends on the specifics of each job. The examiner usually provides feedback to the client during research, and from this dialogue, the study may take a different path or be narrowed to specific areas. The analysis must be accurate, thorough, impartial, recorded, repeatable, and completed within the time scales available and resources allocated. There are myriad tools available for computer forensics analysis. We think the examiner should use any tool they feel comfortable with as long as they can justify their choice. The main requirement of a computer forensic tool is that it does what it is meant to do, and the only way for examiners to be sure of this is to test and calibrate the tools they use before analysis regularly. Dual-tool verification can confirm result integrity during analysis (if with the tool ‘A’ the examiner finds artifact ‘X’ at location ‘Y,’ then tool ‘B’ should replicate these results.)
Presentation
This stage usually involves the examiner producing a structured report on their findings, addressing the points in the initial and subsequent instructions. It would also cover any other information the examiner deems relevant to the investigation. The report must be written with the end reader in mind; in many cases, the reader will be non-technical, so the terminology should acknowledge this. The examiner should also participate in meetings or telephone conferences to discuss and elaborate on the report.
Review
The review stage is often overlooked or disregarded along with the readiness stage. This may be due to the perceived costs of doing work that is not billable or the need ‘to get on with the next job.’ However, a review stage incorporated into each examination can help save money and raise quality by making future tests more efficient and time-effective. An examination review can be simple and quick and begin during the above stages. It may include a basic ‘what went wrong and how can this be improved’ and a ‘what went well and how can it be incorporated into future examinations. Feedback from the instructing party should also be sought. Any lessons from this stage should be applied to the next test and fed into the readiness stage.
Issues facing computer forensics
Computer forensics examiners’ issues can be divided into three broad categories: technical, legal, and administrative. Encryption – Encrypted files or hard drives can be impossible for investigators to view without the correct key or password. Examiners should consider that the key or password may be stored elsewhere on the computer or another computer to which the suspect has access. It could also reside in the volatile memory of a computer (known as RAM [6]), which is usually lost on computer shut-down; this is another reason to consider using live acquisition techniques as outlined above.
Increasing storage space – Storage media holds ever greater amounts of data, which for the examiner means that their analysis computers need to have sufficient processing power and available storage to deal with searching and analyzing enormous amounts of data efficiently.
New technologies – Computing is an ever-changing area, with new hardware, software, and operating systems constantly produced. No computer forensic examiner can be an expert in all areas, though they may frequently be expected to analyze something they haven’t dealt with before. To deal with this situation, the examiner should be prepared and able to test and experiment with the behavior of new technologies. Networking and sharing knowledge with other computer forensic examiners is also beneficial, as someone else may have likely encountered the same issue.
Anti-forensics – Anti-forensics is the practice of attempting to thwart computer forensic analysis. This may include encryption, overwriting data to make it unrecoverable, the modification of files’ meta-data, and obfuscation (disguising files). As with encryption above, the evidence that such methods have been used may be stored elsewhere on the computer or another computer the suspect has access to. In our experience, it is rare to see anti-forensics tools used correctly and frequently enough to obscure either their presence or the presence of the evidence they were used to hide.
Legal issues
Legal arguments may confuse or distract from a computer examiner’s findings. An example here would be the ‘Trojan Defence.’ A Trojan is a piece of computer code disguised as something benign with a hidden and malicious purpose. Trojans have many uses, including key-logging [7], uploading and downloading files, and installing viruses. A lawyer may be able to argue that actions on a computer were not carried out by a user but were automated by a Trojan without the user’s knowledge; such a Trojan Defence has been successfully used even when no trace of a Trojan or other malicious code was found on the suspect’s computer. In such cases, a competent opposing lawyer, supplied with evidence from a qualified computer forensic analyst, should be able to dismiss such an argument.
